A Wise Man
I got a thoughtful letter on Thanksgiving Day from Ken in Massachusetts. He writes: On [your page about religious freedom] you wrote, "Americans tend to think religion is the exact same thing as Christianity. Of course, it isn't." It was years ago that I visited that page and was exposed to that idea for the first time. Subscribe for Free Before then, I was raised devoutly Roman Catholic and attended private Catholic schools, where for 13 years I was surrounded by like-minded people. I was happy and confident in my piety and didn't understand those who were intolerant of religion. But when I started college in 1997, I began encountering people who were different. It was not horrifying; on the contrary, it was fascinating. My upbringing had never taught me that there was so much else to learn and understand! I'm now very comfortably not Roman Catholic. Nor am I agnostic, or atheistic, or much of anything else. A wise man once said, "-ism's in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself." You're welcome, Ken. As I've said for years, True has two missions: to entertain, and to get people to think. I'm glad it apparently did both for you. The path you're on often takes a long time to complete. You may yet return to Catholicism, or head somewhere else. But when you get there, it'll be because you thought about it and made up your own mind, rather than just say "I dunno why I'm Catholic (or Baptist or Anglican or Muslim -- or Democrat or Republican, for that matter); I guess it's because my dad was." I'd much rather spend time with someone who made up their own mind after thinking about the important issues involved than someone who mindlessly follows along without any concept as to why. Two other points: if atheists are telling you it's "your fault" that we're "already in hell," they're not very good atheists! But I suspect that was just a joke. The other, the quote from the wise man, I had to look up. Here's the full quote: Not that I condone fascism, or any "ism" for that matter. Ism's in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an ism, he should believe in himself. I quote John Lennon: "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me." Good point there. After all, he was the walrus. I could be the walrus, I'd still have to bum rides off of people. Sounds more like a wise guy than a wise man, eh? What wise man said this? Ferris Bueller, in the movie Ferris Bueller's Day Off. (Or, really, the screenwriter put those words in his mouth.) You never know what will get you to think. It could be a pop culture movie, it could be a weird news newsletter. Anything that gets you to think about real issues that affect your life is a Good Thing, eh? Ken is indeed a long-time reader: he's been on the Premium distribution for more than ten years. I also found a previous letter from him on the same subject. In December 2001, in response to several other stories that had to do with religion, he wrote: Christianity has so many wonderful qualities. It's a shame that people can't follow them wholeheartedly; if they did, then they'd be wiser than to be caught in so many of the religion's pitfalls. Neither: smile inwardly because you get to witness someone starting to wake up and think! You don't have to lecture them or tell them what to think, but you can encourage them to keep it up and discover their own path, just like you did. Trust me: it's immensely gratifying to watch it happen. Blog Updates
|
Most Recent Comments
RC, The "isms" quote was immediately recognizable, to me, and I'm sure to a lot of others, before you looked it up and gave everyone the info.
"Ferris Bueller's Day Off" is a classic, one of my top favorite movies of all time. It's not just "a pop culture movie," as you wrote, but, IMHO, a great and funny piece work of video art that is truly full of wisdom, and put in truly hilarious terms accessible to everyone. There are other lines like, "Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and take a look around once in a while, you might miss it."
AND
(To a groveling maitre d' who had just finished treating him like dirt): "It's understanding that makes people like us tolerate a person such as yourself."
This may well be the best comedy movie of the 1980s AND '90s.
Posted by: Jonny H. in Seoul | November 26, 2007 10:46 PM
If you have not read Richard Dawkins The God Delusion, you are missing out on many keen insights with humor and great critical thinking. He has analyzed religion in general and Christianity in particular in extreme detail. It will make you seriously reconsider your beliefs.
---
...Which is why many will refuse to read it, because they're insecure enough that they don't want their beliefs challenged. -rc
Posted by: Bert - Lakewood, CO | November 28, 2007 3:28 PM
Bert in Lakewood, I would like to have agreed with you about "The God Delusion." I am a huge Dawkins fan, and I've read most of his books. I even agree with him about creation and evolution. However, the message I got from this book was: "I have no respect for religious people because they believe in something even though there isn't enough evidence of it to convince me." When you give no respect, you should not expect to receive it.
You know, something doesn't have to be scientific to be rational. Everybody goes around building a theory of how the world works in their own mind, and they piece it together out of whatever they believe is true. It is certain that no one's theory is completely correct. It is also equally certain that every sane person's theory is rational, because otherwise the cognitive dissonance would make it very hard for them to function. What I mean by "rational" here is that their theory must both explain and also hold up to all the evidence they have. Given the evidence every human being has, it's rational to believe that Someone or several Someones are controlling everything, and it's rational to believe that everything follows natural laws that control everything. Both of those theories explain everything in the entire world easily and succinctly. How can one of them be "delusional?" Based on false evidence, maybe. Rejecting evidence that does not fit the personal theory, maybe. But if they're delusional, they're only delusional in the way every human being is. Dawkins is just as blind as any fundamentalist when it comes to seeing how flawed we all are in judging what is true and what is false.
Posted by: Devin, Philadelphia | December 4, 2007 10:21 PM