Bear Country Update
An update on the Bear Story from a couple of weeks ago. Now that Donna, the woman who was feeding them, is dead, sure enough: more bears are now invading town, breaking into houses far more than before to try to find food -- Donna isn't there to feed them, and what they now know is humans = food. Winter is coming, and they need to fatten up for hibernation; they're ravenous. Last week another of my friends had her place broken into; she has two teen daughters; one was home at the time, and came face to face with the unafraid bear. Free Weird Newsletter Today, one of Donna's family members commented on my earlier blog post. She laments that the family has to deal with such a horrible way for her aunt to die, but acknowledges that she essentially agrees with the blog posts she has read. She even admits that last year, she stayed with her aunt for a month, and saw what was going on. Yet she didn't do anything. She did nothing even knowing how much danger her aunt was in; that danger became a reality, and her aunt is now dead. She did nothing to reduce the danger to the hundreds -- thousands -- of people who live in the roaming range of the bears: 35 miles for females, even wider for males. Yeah, I feel sorry for the family, but they were part of the problem: they knew this was going on, and they chose to do nothing. Yet I still understand it: who should have taken action? A niece? A daughter? A brother? It's a big step to have a family member declared incompetent and forced to move out of their home and into (very expensive!) care. I can understand wanting someone else to take the lead -- while this continued on for a decade.... (Update: After this was posted, Munson's daughter also posted a comment.)
The bottom line, though, is everyone who knew Donna knew she was doing this. I know they didn't want to "cause trouble" for her; they didn't want to have to be "the" witness for the prosecution, getting on the stand to say "Yes: this is what she was doing." So everyone -- wildlife officials, family, friends, neighbors -- ended up looking the other way, so now Donna is dead, several bears are dead, other bears will be killed, a lot of damage is being done to people's houses and property, and hundreds of people, adult and child, are at a much greater risk of being mauled or killed. Everyone who had firsthand knowledge of what Donna was doing, but said nothing, must share her guilt. I live here, and now know about it; I'm not going to join that silence and be guilty too, even if that means I have to be one of the few to say it directly to Donna's family members. Blog Updates
|
Most Recent Comments
Posted by Beth, Raleigh NC on September 5, 2009:
While watching the Today show this morning I noted that feeding dolphins in South Florida carries a $12,000 fine while feeding bears carries only a $100.00 fine. Am I the only one who notices the dolphins obviously have a much better lobby group? I understand the need to not feed any wild animals having grown up in a rural area but feeding a 'cute' dolphin endangers the dolphin bringing them to close to boats and other water traffic. Feeding bears endangers everyone, they are very large very dangerous animals. Why such a large difference in fines? Is it just a question of good PR?
Posted by Dolly in NC on September 11, 2009:
Your statement gives me pause: "It's a big step to have a family member declared incompetent...."
I was up north (Maine) visiting my mother (89) who insists on feeding the raccoons out her back door. I've told her I didn't think it was a good idea, but she insists, even after I noticed a dead raccoon along the road. I told her she contributed to its death by inviting the wildlife to her property so near the road.
Is there really a case for declaring someone incompetent? I wouldn't do it, but maybe the threat would be enough to stop her. I fear rabies or an attack on her person. Also processed food (bread and milk) can't be all that good for wildlife either. At the very least she's wasting her limited funds and putting herself through extra work every day by washing the pans. Am I being alarmist? On the other hand, if it's raccoons now, might it not be bears to show up next?
---
There's a line -- a fuzzy, gray one -- between competent and not. It's hard to say that feeding raccoons puts someone across the line. It's EASY to say that feeding bears, and going after one with a broom because it's "naughty", is over that line. In your case, if it's not obvious to you, it won't be obvious to a judge. -rc
Posted by Alan, VA on September 12, 2009:
Just a quick note - I noticed another bear attack in the Daily Press (Hampton Roads) in Aspen, CO. I take it the situation hasn't gotten any better. You mentioned in the original post that "a fed bear is a dead bear." According to the article 9 bears have had to be euthanized this summer. It also mentioned he was attacked at his home while checking on his barking dogs. Here's hoping that the actions of others don't put you and your family at risk.
---
Aspen is actually about a four-hour drive from here, so it's not directly related to the situation here; they have their own bear problem. I haven't heard if there was someone feeding bears in the same way in Aspen, or if it's simply a problem with a multitude of people not properly securing their trash in bear country. -rc