Civic Pride
There were several cranky responses to a story in last week's issue. Let's start with the story, from the edition dated 5 July 2009: Free Weird Newsletter Deceiving Diversity The city of Toronto, Ont., Canada, published a brochure on things to do around town. The "Fun Guide" showed a family having fun on the cover, but it was a family of "indeterminate ethnic background" -- the family "looks maybe Latino," said city spokesman Kevin Sack. To be more "inclusive," the city pasted a black man's face over the father figure. "You won't find a more inclusive organization than us," Sack said. (National Post) ...And black people are welcome to have fun in the city, as long as they only visit virtually. Now, before we get into the discussion, it might help to have the photos involved, yes? Well, of course I have them for you!
My favorite part isn't the pasted-in face, but rather that they felt it necessary to darken the fingers wrapped around the kid on the left -- they assumed the guy had freakishly long arms that wrapped around the entire family, rather than realize the fingers were from the mother's hand. Duh. The story -- or, at least, the tagline -- brought a number of complaints. The least vitriolic letter is from Richard in Toronto, who wrote: I'm sure you didn't mean it, but the phraseology used in your Toronto story implies blacks are not welcome as visitors, i.e. "only if they come virtually". I wouldn't be surprised if some comments to this page will choose to debate the "the most ethnically diverse city in the world" point, but I'm not. Richard is "sure [I] didn't mean it" but the "phraseology implies blacks are not welcome". He misses the point: I'm not saying that, but I wouldn't be surprised if racial "minorities" got that impression from the city's actions. They couldn't find a black family to get a photo of? Really? And what of the "maybe Latino" guys in the city: the photo implies what? That Latino dads are absent, and some other guy has to step in? Photographs send powerful messages, and the amateurish doctoring of this one sends a message too -- whether the city meant to or not. That is what the story is about: their thinking they needed to fake diversity. What a slap in the face of the people who are living it every day. So yeah, I "meant it" when I implied that people can be rightly offended by the city feeling it needed to fake diversity. But I'm happy to say that not all Torontonians are as clueless as the city's employees. Nicole in Toronto: This isn't a criticism - I totally get the joke. We're a politically correct bunch up here and our bureaucracy is as goofy as you'll find anywhere, but I did want to say that we really are a diverse city. Don't quite know why they had to fake the photo, but please let everyone know - regardless of race, religion, or sexual orientation, you can have a great time in Toronto. The city's two best summer events are the huge Gay Pride Weekend (unfortunately, you've just missed it) and Caribana - the biggest Caribbean celebration outside of the Islands, which starts next week. Okay, we're a bit stinky right now with a garbage strike, but it's still a pretty fun city to visit. And it's not nearly as WASP as you'd think, so come and check out the city in person - a virtual visit just isn't the same! Now that's an "inclusive" attitude! Speaking of Civic PrideI also got a lot of complaints when I mentioned several weeks ago that I was traveling to "Pittsburg" when, in fact, I was on my way to Pittsburgh, Penn. Most said or implied I was stupid for making such a mistake. I don't consider it stupid: I'm from California, and spent a good part of my life near Pittsburg, Calif. So sue me that I got used to a different, not a "wrong", spelling. It could be worse -- much worse. The first skyscraper in Pittsburgh (the one in Pennsylvania) is the Grant Building, constructed in 1928. To make it even taller, they put a tower on top for KDKA radio's broadcast antenna. The then Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover, asked the city to put a flashing beacon on the tower for airplane safety, and city fathers decided if they had to have a flashing beacon, it should "say" something. So the beacon flashed in Morse Code "PITTSBURGH". Well, it did until the current building owners made a change. Now, according to a story in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, it says "PITETSBKRRH". So before you go around calling someone from out of town "stupid" for being in too much of a hurry to notice he used a variant spelling, maybe you should stop to first realize the impression you are flashing out to the world! Because let me tell you, not everything you write is perfect either. Blog Updates
|
Most Recent Comments
Posted by Karen in Cincinnati, OH on July 20, 2009:
The black face they used is SOOOOO Creepy! He's leering at the mother!!! The real picture was beautiful, how unfortunate that they felt the need to change it. Hopefully, they will have learned their lesson on this one.
Posted by Linda, Louisville, KY on July 20, 2009:
I wonder if the man in the original picture still got compensated for using his photo, even though his face is covered. These pictures are usually posed with professional models who make their living by having their pictures used by different organizations. And did they then have to also pay the black man to use his face too? If so I think they got ripped off. That freaky looking face would not encourage me to want to go anywhere mentioned in the magazine.
Posted by Doug Kansas City MO on September 18, 2009:
What I find interesting is the same picture is used at Wal-Mart for a sample picture for a frame....
---
I assume you mean the original stock photo. Well, then, no wonder the Toronto folks were caught so quickly and easily! -rc