Ed Freeman and Political Manipulation
I generally don't want suggestions for True's Honorary Unsubscribe feature; my usual problem is having far too many possibilities for the one slot each week. In July, a new trend started, and has not stopped (I got another last week): people wanting me to do an Honorary Unsubscribe write-up for Ed Freeman, a brave Vietnam War helicopter pilot who saved about 30 shot-up kids and was awarded the Medal of Honor -- the U.S.'s highest military decoration. Weekly Weird News And then there's the kicker, the angry twist: "Shame on the American Media" for not honoring Ed Freeman with obituaries and news stories after this great American hero died on June 25, 2009. Does that date sound familiar? Might not; I had to look to confirm that indeed it's the same date Michael Jackson died. It is. "Michael Jackson dies and it's 24/7 news coverage," the e-mail that everyone has been forwarding to me concludes. But, "A real American hero dies and not a mention of it in the news. The media has no honor and God is watching." Ignoring the implication that God takes sides in our earthly wars*, there's a good reason the media ignored Ed Freeman on June 25 in favor of Michael Jackson: Ed Freeman didn't die on June 25, 2009. Rather, he died on August 20, 2008 -- ten months prior to Michael Jackson. Now, I actually pay attention to the obituaries because I honor someone each week. And you know what? I noticed that he died, because "the media" did, in fact, honor him very well with obituaries and news stories about this great American hero. * ("Our task should not be to invoke religion and the name of God by claiming God's blessing and endorsement for all our national policies and practices, saying, in effect, that God is on our side. Rather, we should pray and worry earnestly whether we are on God's side." --Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the U.S.) So who didn't notice the death of the great American hero? That's right: the readers who are complaining about the coverage of someone who did die on June 25, 2009. So if it's "shame on" anyone, it's those who didn't notice those numerous stories about Freeman -- those who either didn't pay attention or, worse, forgot about Ed Freeman. But instead of honoring him, they use him as a political pawn to complain that the public cares about other people, too. And yet these hypocrites dare to point fingers and scream "SHAME!"? They should be looking in the mirror when they do it.
Worse, this political manipulation was done on purpose: someone had to put that fake date on there, and I have little doubt that it was done knowingly. Snopes, which tracks and debunks stories like this, notes that the same e-mail was previously used to compare the "lack of coverage" of Freeman's death with "some Hip-Hop coward beating the crap out of his 'girlfriend'" -- a reference, Snopes says, to "rapper Chris Brown's having been arrested in February 2009 on charges of battery against his girlfriend, Rihanna." Yet that was manipulation too: that February 2009 arrest was six months after Freeman's death. There's another similarity: Chris Brown is a black entertainer. Michael Jackson was a black entertainer. And Ed Freeman? A white guy. Smells of racism, doesn't it? Would a Medal of Honor recipient condone his name being used to perpetuate racism? I doubt it very, very much. There's a reason my Spam Primer talks about spam "and other e-mail pests" like chain letters. They're very often used for political manipulation. Think back to the recent presidential campaign, where e-mails circulated like mad with charges like Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., or that he "refuses" to pledge allegiance to the flag, or "refuses" to wear an American flag lapel pin. Or that he's actually a Muslim. Each and every one a lie, but sent out to manipulate the gullible. Hey, did you notice? Obama is black too. Maybe it's a coincidence, but I just don't think so. Now, if you have legitimate gripes about the president, that's fine. I'm not, in fact, a Democrat myself, and some of his actions have given me pause; no one is going to agree with every decision, every policy, every initiative of any president. But do you want to be used as a pawn in a disinformation campaign with political or racist goals? If not, then think about that e-mail you get that says you should "pass on to everyone you know" no matter how good the cause sounds. Check it on Snopes or another apolitical debunking site to see if it's real, or not. There are plenty of real horrors in the world to get up in arms about, and those horrors are more deserving of your attention than made-up stories designed to support some fringe political position. In other words, think FIRST, before you hit Send. Trust me: that's not too difficult. Oh, and don't send me the manipulative chain e-mail saying Snopes is political! That's garbage too! Sheesh! So, did I, in fact, honor Ed Freeman in the Honorary Unsubscribe? No; I had some weeks earlier honored a Medal of Honor recipient (Jack Lucas -- remember?), and in August 2008 someone who was a personal hero and had an impact on the creation of True died, and I honored him instead: Lawrence Urdang. As I said, the problem is having far too many possibilities: there are a lot of worthy people who had real impact on others who die every single day. The "Ed Freeman" Chain MailThis is the text of the e-mail that readers have been forwarding to me:
Ed Freeman Medal of Honor CitationThe text of the citation for Freeman's Medal of Honor: By direction of the President, under the Joint Resolution of Congress approved 12 July 1862 (amended by act of 3 March 1863, act of 9 July 1918, and act of 25 July 1963), the Medal of Honor for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life above and beyond the call of duty, is awarded by the Department of the Army in the name of Congress to:(Source: U.S. Army) January 15 UpdateThe e-mail has started going around again, with Ed Freeman having "died last Wednesday" and now, instead of Chris Brown or Michael Jackson being targeted, Tiger Woods has been substituted. If you took a poll, you would likely find that Woods is black too -- yet another data point in the pattern I discussed. Blog Updates
| |||||||||
Most Recent Comments
Posted by Neil, Cheshire, UK on May 6, 2010:
Is it generally assumed in the US that people are party members unless otherwise specified? I misjudged Randy's political stance when I started reading TRUE (although I'm not the sort to object to the idea that someone might in some way disagree with me) but I took it as read that he wasn't a party member and would judge how to vote on the merits of various parties' policies on each occasion. I now gather that's what you call an Independent; here in the UK that refers to people who actually run for election without joining a party (or perhaps who support such people), and identifying oneself with a party implies (perhaps long-term) support, not membership.
---
I think a great many Americans assume people are a member of one party or the other, even though the reality is quite different. The U.S. Census Bureau reports there are about 146 million registered voters in the U.S. According to Pew Research, about 36 percent of registered voters identify themselves as Democrats, and just 27 percent identify as Republicans, leaving the largest "party" -- or about 37 percent of voters -- being "none of the above". That's where I sit. -rc
Posted by Anton in Cascadia on July 7, 2010:
"Natural born citizen" means a citizen from birth, not necessarily by place of birth. (I was born abroad to US parents myself, so I'm a citizen under the Nationality Act of 1952 rather than under the Fourteenth Amendment.) The glitch in Obama's case, supposing that he was born abroad, is this: if only one parent is a US citizen, then citizenship is inherited only if that parent lived in the US for five years after age 14, and mom wasn't yet 19 when he was born.
Posted by Alex in UT on July 26, 2010:
If it is alright with you, I would like to forward this to all of the people in my family that get sucked into the propaganda news distribution.
I feel like I am banging my head into a wall when I try to have a FACTUAL conversation with many that I am surrounded by.
Randy....you rock.
---
You're always welcome to send the URL of such pages to others, but of course you may not forward the text. -rc