Randy Cassingham's Blog

Posted by Michael, Mo. on May 16, 2011:

He gives Christians a bad name.

---

Sure, but oh dear: you're gonna hate the next blog entry, being posted in a few minutes! -rc

Posted by Butch in Waco on May 16, 2011:

Real Christians don't defile their Temple.

Posted by Terry, Colorado on May 16, 2011:

I see the problem already! When he tries to read the motto every morning, it would be backwards in the mirror! He just forgot what it said.

Posted by Mike from Dallas on May 16, 2011:

Reaffirming the old adage, God loves him, but his neighbors all agree that he's an asshole.

Posted by Dave - Victoria, Australia on May 16, 2011:

If that bloke moved into the house next to mine, I'd be moving! Seriously, if anyone needs to tattoo that type of message on their forehead, they must be a few sandwiches short of a picnic!

Posted by Owen in Chocowinity on May 16, 2011:

It's a shame everyone doesn't come with similar, appropriate, warning labels.

Posted by Cheryl, Rochester, NY on May 16, 2011:

This reminds me of a joke I heard a while ago:

A woman is on her way to church when she sees a cop car behind her turn on its lights, so she pulls over.

"What seems to be the problem, Officer?" she asks when the cop comes to her window. "Was I speeding?"

"No," the cop replied. "Can I see license and registration, please?"

The woman gives the cop her license and registration, he reads them over, then hands both back to the woman.

"I apologize for pulling you over, m'am," he says. "It's just that I was behind you a few miles back at a traffic light and noticed all the Christian bumperstickers on the rear of your car, so when you laid on the horn when the car in front of you didn't go as soon as the light turned green and then you flipped off the driver, I assumed the car was stolen."

If you're going to broadcast your faith, it's a good idea to live according to it.

Posted by Greg in CT on May 17, 2011:

He should have included a disclaimer: "WARNING! Stupid act to follow..."

Posted by Mark in Aurora, CO on May 17, 2011:

Given the different font and style, I think the two parts of the tattoo were done at different times.

I also think, the second part of the tattoo is a direct reference to having tattooed the first part on his forehead.

Posted by Mike from Dallas on May 17, 2011:

"What, do I have STUPID tattooed on my forehead, or something?"

Well, in so many words....