I was in panic reading this headline. Shades of Newton Minow! TV is STILL a "vast wasteland". In fact, it is even worse now than in the sixties and seventies. I will admit to watching C-Span2 on weekends when they do all the book "reviews".
I can see where you're coming from, but I really, really, really despise all the commercials. By all, I mean the plethora of constant haranguing and repetition and utter boredom they create in their attempt to enforce a product name on the captive audience. Buying "movie only" channels is way too expensive for me (Comcast and Gouge are synonymous in my mind). Renting or buying films subjects me to still more ads, usually attempting to sell more garbage to me. (Never mind the fact that most movies are at best worthy of only one viewing.) I will further add, with your permission, that the FCC controlling the amount of time ads may be shown during a given time period is about as effective as the EPA doing anything about pollution and the warming climate.
---
Newton Minow was the chairman of the FCC in 1961 when he gave his "vast wasteland" speech. (He reflected on it in Time magazine in 1995.) Indeed, it has gotten worse, and the barrage of inane commercials is one of the reasons I watch very little TV. We're seeing the decline of the networks before our eyes, and rather than doing anything to stop it, they're hastening their own deaths. There's a reason HBO gets so many Emmy awards, and they're not even a "network"! But I pay enough to get TV (since the only way I can get a signal is by satellite), and I don't use my hard-earned income on pay channels either. -rc
I watch very little TV on TV these days. But as I'm overseas I still keep up with half a dozen shows via BitTorrent. (Another advantage of this method: no commercials.) Half of them are British. Considering the number of shows on TV, it's still decidedly a wasteland, but now and then there's a tree.
I submit for your perusal: "Hustle", "Spooks", and (in the US) "House".
"House"...? My wife likes that show; I can't see why. Started off well, a doc with an attitude. But as it developed, they make about 12 MISdiagnoses, all to the patient's detriment, before finally finding a cure. I hope I never end up in such a hospital where they experiment in hopes of helping me. But then, it IS in New Jersey...
And besides his inability to make a correct diagnosis, the guy is also a whiner using his handicap as a crutch (that was bad) to rationalize his substance abuse (maybe why he's inept at disgnoses), and also uses/abuses his few friendships, not to mention straining any professional relationships. No other hospital would even consider hiring this guy.
And this is a role model??? I might consider it realistic if it weren't for the fact that hospitals won't do any unnecessary tests without the patient's ability to pay, and insurance will deny a lot of those.
Makes about as much sense at that show about a blind cop who carried a gun. Oh wait, after that incident in NYC with some 50 shots to bring down one suspect, maybe that is realistic.
I Like TV - Comments
I was in panic reading this headline. Shades of Newton Minow! TV is STILL a "vast wasteland". In fact, it is even worse now than in the sixties and seventies. I will admit to watching C-Span2 on weekends when they do all the book "reviews".
I can see where you're coming from, but I really, really, really despise all the commercials. By all, I mean the plethora of constant haranguing and repetition and utter boredom they create in their attempt to enforce a product name on the captive audience. Buying "movie only" channels is way too expensive for me (Comcast and Gouge are synonymous in my mind). Renting or buying films subjects me to still more ads, usually attempting to sell more garbage to me. (Never mind the fact that most movies are at best worthy of only one viewing.) I will further add, with your permission, that the FCC controlling the amount of time ads may be shown during a given time period is about as effective as the EPA doing anything about pollution and the warming climate.
---
Newton Minow was the chairman of the FCC in 1961 when he gave his "vast wasteland" speech. (He reflected on it in Time magazine in 1995.) Indeed, it has gotten worse, and the barrage of inane commercials is one of the reasons I watch very little TV. We're seeing the decline of the networks before our eyes, and rather than doing anything to stop it, they're hastening their own deaths. There's a reason HBO gets so many Emmy awards, and they're not even a "network"! But I pay enough to get TV (since the only way I can get a signal is by satellite), and I don't use my hard-earned income on pay channels either. -rc
Posted by: Igor, New Mexico | January 27, 2007 12:47 PM
I watch very little TV on TV these days. But as I'm overseas I still keep up with half a dozen shows via BitTorrent. (Another advantage of this method: no commercials.) Half of them are British. Considering the number of shows on TV, it's still decidedly a wasteland, but now and then there's a tree.
I submit for your perusal: "Hustle", "Spooks", and (in the US) "House".
Posted by: Tom in Amsterdam | February 24, 2007 8:16 AM
"House"...? My wife likes that show; I can't see why. Started off well, a doc with an attitude. But as it developed, they make about 12 MISdiagnoses, all to the patient's detriment, before finally finding a cure. I hope I never end up in such a hospital where they experiment in hopes of helping me. But then, it IS in New Jersey...
And besides his inability to make a correct diagnosis, the guy is also a whiner using his handicap as a crutch (that was bad) to rationalize his substance abuse (maybe why he's inept at disgnoses), and also uses/abuses his few friendships, not to mention straining any professional relationships. No other hospital would even consider hiring this guy.
And this is a role model??? I might consider it realistic if it weren't for the fact that hospitals won't do any unnecessary tests without the patient's ability to pay, and insurance will deny a lot of those.
Makes about as much sense at that show about a blind cop who carried a gun. Oh wait, after that incident in NYC with some 50 shots to bring down one suspect, maybe that is realistic.
Posted by: Mike from Dallas | April 13, 2007 12:51 PM
Read the article that everyone's commenting on, or post a comment about it.