This is True
Randy Cassingham

Randy Cassingham's Blog

Historical Details and Author's Notes from This is True® - the First For-Profit E-mail Publication (and Still Going Strong).

bullet  Jerry Falwell, American Taliban

Jerry Falwell died this week. There's quite a bit of traffic coming into my page where I dubbed Falwell one of the American Taliban in disgust over his using the 9/11 terrorist attacks to further his own agenda. I followed some of those links back to the blogs which were quoting me, with titles such as JERRY FALWELL IS DEAD. Good. and I'm glad he is dead. Indeed there were so many that I Googled the combination of "Cassingham" and "Falwell" ...and got a couple of hundred hits.

And what timing: I just caught up copying over blog postings from 2002, which included an entry titled Evangelical = Hatemonger? (which, I'll hasten to add, was not sparked by me, but by a Christian pastor who is sometimes ashamed to be known as a man of the cloth.) Falwell is a supreme example of what Pastor John was talking about in his letter to me.

It will be interesting to see what people have to say about Falwell in the comments to this entry, and whether anyone cares to defend his zealotry -- just the sort of hatred and shit-stirring that led our founding fathers to decide that a "separation of church and state" was a good idea when setting up our country. Falwell certainly didn't believe in that tenet: "The idea that religion and politics don't mix was invented by the Devil to keep Christians from running their own country," he said in a sermon "celebrating" the country's bicentennial (July 4, 1976. Source: Positive Atheism, the first hit in the Google search mentioned above). Though my favorite quote there was something he said on CNN in 1997: "Grown men should not be having sex with prostitutes unless they are married to them." I'm sincerely hoping that's not a slam on Mrs. Falwell.

Goodbye and good riddance, Mr. Falwell (using the title "Rev." is an insult to the men and women who truly believe in salvation). May your shoes be filled by a true spiritual leader who doesn't believe that their way is the only way. There should be room in his or her heart for those who don't seriously believe, as Falwell did, "If you're not a born-again Christian, you're a failure as a human being." To see a failed human being, Falwell needed only to look in a mirror.

Last, regarding Get Out of Hell Free cards: Falwell's is most definitely stamped "VOID".

21 May Update

I'm going to hell again, I guess, for an editorial I wrote for Friday's free edition (above). In it, I note "It will be interesting to see what people have to say about [Jerry] Falwell in the comments to this entry, and whether anyone cares to defend his zealotry." I should have been more specific: I meant a thoughtful, reasoned defense, and there has been precious little so far (see comments). And despite my asking people to make their remarks in public, on the blog, e-mail flows in. Such as Stephen: "Geez, Thank god I never upgraded. I love it when liberal hatemongers can't seem to get past their own hatreds so much they don't realize that much of what they perceive as hate is nothing of the sort."

So... preaching hate is fine; objecting to it is an opportunity for name-calling. And isn't the interjection "Geez" a diminutive for yelling "JESUS!" as a curse? Tsk tsk. And I thought not capitalizing "god" is supposed to be an insult to Him. Does that mean Stephen is going to hell? And yeah yeah, I'm a liberal hatemonger; when I slammed Clinton I was a Rush Limbaugh Republican. In other words, If anyone dares to criticize a conservative, he must be not just any sort of liberal, but a hateful liberal; if anyone dares to criticize a liberal, he must be a hateful conservative.

Bull. There's a reason that less than a third each of the public registers as either Democrat or Republican -- the largest "party" by far is independent. The two parties, by their insistence that everything has to be black and white (or red and blue) alienates voters who know that there is more to talk about than the extremes. More of us are in the middle than at the edges, and we can, will, and should call others to task for the damage they cause by preaching hate, no matter what side of the political spectrum they're on. Yes, the "normal" unsubscribe rate is about double this week, representing people who would rather run and hide their ears than actually debate important issues. But that's still a very small number -- well under half of one percent of the readership. I said what I thought needed to be said, and I'll suffer the circulation drop proudly.

Most Recent Comments

What's the matter, Randy? Can't take the heat of someone with intelligence that doesn't agree with your constant obsession of padding your already overinflated ego? I think you need to seek some professional help. What a two bit whinner.

Do America a favor and stop writing altogether or learn to accept criticism from all walks of life and be willing to post such.

---

I'm not sure what this refers to; the only message I find that I've sent to you was a note to say that your point was already well covered in previous comments. But I'll reply to your points here one by one:

  • I'm fine with intelligent messages. Haven't seen one from you.
  • You do seem to be an expert on professional help. The only insanity I see here is someone clinging to a point already made, and coming back for more anyway, on a terribly old issue. Isn't that the definition of insanity -- doing the same thing again and again in hopes the outcome will differ? It won't.
  • I don't know what a "whinner" is. Someone who whinnies? I do see at least a part of a horse from here, but somehow I don't think that's what you had in mind.
  • You seem unclear on what it means to be an American. The American Way doesn't include attempts at censorship. If you don't like my writing, quit coming to my web site to read what I have to say. (And re-read point 2.)

There. All better now? -rc

"...your constant obsession of padding your already overinflated ego..."

One time I had need of an attorney. He told me what he charged and added, "I'm damned good at what I do."

Now, I find such a statement means only two things: Either he's an idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about (and he'll be out of business very soon) or he's damned good at what he does.

I have a lot of respect for those with overinflated egos. I have considerably less tolerance for those who continually equivocate (now THERE'S the correct usage of the word) on a subject.

Since this publication has been around for a lot of years and is still growing, I'd say that the overinflated ego is well-earned and to be envied. (BTW, the attorney was also well worth what he charged.)

P.S.: For Randy to take personal time to respond, in all the volume of comments, is a sign of respect right there, regardless of favorability or lack of it. Too bad some don't recognize respect when it's offered.

---

While I may not one to judge, my ego is actually fairly healthy, especially considering how few writers are successful on their own, that I've had my hand in on saving quite a few lives, and I have a great wife. All in all, I'm just a regular guy. After meeting plenty of prima donnas from Hollywood and elsewhere, I wouldn't have it any other way. -rc

I'm bemused by the fact that several readers wondered why you didn't revile Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson while criticizing Falwell.

Falwell's death made him temporarily newsworthy. Seems obvious.

Moreover, Sharpton and Jackson are far less influential than Falwell was; he founded the "Moral Majority," slung the Republican party so far rightward that it's now devouring its own hiney, and invented the abortion debate, forcing it to become a public, legislative decision instead of the private decision it should be.

Jackson and Sharpton are well to the fringe of the Democratic party, if they're even in the tent at all. The vast majority of Democrats keep their distance, not true of Republicans with Falwell.

---

I'd have to do a search of my stuff to be sure, but I'd be surprised if there weren't stories making fun of the doings of both Jackson and Sharpton. Even if there are none, they still have plenty of time to be featured!

But the real point here is the implication -- that I bash the right more than the left. When Clinton was in office, the charge was reversed: that I bashed the left more (Example). It's all perception. -rc

Post a Comment

Read this before posting a comment! Comments are of course the opinion of the poster. All comments must be approved by the site owner before they appear. Only interesting, pertinent comments that have to do with the entry will be approved, and all comments may be edited for brevity, flow, or grammar. Read the existing comments before posting your own to ensure you're not saying something that's already been covered.

Blog Updates