Politics and Tibet
We have now left Lhasa, Tibet, and we discovered that this was quite an interesting time to be here, politically speaking. Subscribe for Free
The True Readers China Tour group in front of Lhasa's Potala Palace.
Left to Right: Mike, Jia (our national guide who put this amazing trip together), Joe, CJ, Kim, Miles, Gwen, Jeff, Lilly (seated in front of Jeff), Tim, Kit, me, Folia, Tom and Lisa -- a terrific and stimulating group of readers. Our local guide was a native Tibetan, and a Buddhist, and was very knowledgeable about the history of Tibet, the history of Buddhism, and more. He talked quite a bit of the history of the Dalai Lamas -- up to Number 13; he never spoke of the 14th, the current Dalai Lama, and either ignored questions about him or refused to answer them. There is a simple reason, of course: China put down an uprising in Tibet in 1959, and does not recognize the Dalai Lama, who escaped to exile when the uprising failed. (I don't think I need to go into that here; if you want to know more, Wikipedia has extensive information.)
And what timing that we should be in Tibet this week: the Dalai Lama is in Washington D.C. this week to meet privately with President Bush and to receive a Congressional Gold Medal -- the highest civilian honor given in the U.S. "We solemnly demand that the U.S. cancel the extremely wrong arrangements," said Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi hours before the meeting. "It seriously violates the norm of international relations and seriously wounded the feelings of the Chinese people and interfered with China's internal affairs." "We in no way want to stir the pot and make China feel that we are poking a stick in their eye," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino, who insisted that the meeting and medal were simply to honor "a great spiritual leader" and promote greater religious freedom in Tibet. Yet the timing hardly looks like a coincidence: also this week is the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, a significant meeting that determines political leadership for the following five years. Understandably, the Chinese government is thus quite upset with the U.S. (It was interesting trying to research this entry -- finding the right link to the Wikipedia article, even getting news articles about the Dalai Lama -- many of the pages I tried to go to were blocked. I am, after all, in the middle of mainland China, connected through Chinese-based Internet access.... This entry was updated after my return to the U.S. to add detail I couldn't get from China.) Blog Updates
|
Most Recent Comments
You refer to "mainland China." Is there another China?
---
Absolutely -- I've already talked about Hong Kong and Macao, and it also does not include Taiwan. China probably considers Tibet to be part of the mainland; others don't. "Mainland China" is a geopolitical term that has been in use for 57 years. Try to keep up. :-) -rc
Posted by: Richard, New York | October 27, 2007 9:10 PM
Your note of the "secret" police. Um, besides being a little dramatic in phrasing, if you knew who they were, exactly how secret could they have been? ;)
---
Note I mentioned that the locals told us about them. They're quite familiar with the sight. -rc
Posted by: John, Glendale (AZ) | October 31, 2007 7:03 PM
Tibet aside, you're lucky to access anything at Wikipedia at all, since it's one of those sites that usually gets wholly blocked by the Great Firewall. Over the past few years it's probably been blocked, unblocked, and reblocked more than any other website. Of the 1-1/2 years I lived in China, I think we had a grand total of 1 month of Wikipedia access!
Luckily, there are plenty of anonymizing sites to let everyone get around the censors. It's so common that I've even seen published media listings that included anonymized URLs since the sites were blocked!
Posted by: Meg, Oslo | November 6, 2007 3:56 AM