The ZT'd Reader: Other Readers Respond
Last week's editorial brought a fair number of letters. Here are some of the best. Weekly Weird News
John concluded with a quotation along the same lines: "If we accept the view that the American people cannot be trusted with the material objects necessary to defend their liberty, we will surely accept as well the view that the American people cannot be trusted with liberty itself. Why should a man who can't be trusted to refrain from murder be trusted with the much more difficult and morally subtle task of choosing his leaders responsibly?" --Alan Keyes, "The Armed Defense of Liberty," July 30, 1999
I'm not against lawsuits, I'm against frivolous lawsuits (I wrote an entire book about them.) Lawsuits are clearly a good tool to fight ZT, but it's no easy solution. It costs money to prosecute a suit and, very importantly, a lot of time -- usually years. And lots of time in another sense: hundreds of hours of depositions, hearings, answering questions, digging up documents. It's truly an arduous process, but for the truly outrageous situations I not only agree it's a good tool, I encourage it. Quite a few people sent their own ZT stories, things that have either happened to them, or to others at their schools. Some were several years old, yet the events are still very fresh in their minds, and they're angry. They know injustice when they see it, and to see such injustice being institutionalized in rules makes them seethe. And rightly so: It's just that growing anger that I'm trying to tap into. The tagline on one of the ZT stories I wrote recently -- "This will continue to get worse until enough citizens say 'STOP!'" -- is quite literally true. I set out some time ago to show that these stories aren't some sort of aberration at just some schools here and there; this is a societal problem that's widespread not only in schools, not only in the U.S., but is growing toward the norm everywhere. And as long as we just sit on our butts and watch, it will continue to grow. Only by saying "NO!" and "STOP!" will something happen. And that's not just when it happens to your kid, but when it happens to any kid, any teen, any adult. When you see something that's clearly not right, you need to say so. In public meetings, in letters to the editor, in letters to your elected representatives. And when you see someone else standing up to defend others being railroaded by ZT, you need to stand together. Back them up, and ask that others back you up. There's something very powerful in a crowd of people showing up at a public meeting to say "I don't want this" -- I've seen it. I've been in the crowd. Yes, it's hard. Yes, it takes time. But if you, who understands the problem, doesn't work toward fixing it, who will? As I said, I got a lot of letters, but I won't use them to fill space here -- I really can't do more to illustrate the ZT problem than to demonstrate it with stories and suggest how to deal with it. I've done my part, and will continue to do so. I hope you'll stand up and be counted too. It's the right thing to do. Blog Updates
|
3 Comments on This Entry
All comments in this blog are reviewed prior to being published. Spammers: don't waste your time. The posting criteria are simple: if a comment is worth visitors' time to read, it's approved. If not, it's not.
Posted by Cat, Albuquerque on June 7, 2008:
The excesses of ZT are the equivalent of far too many "laws" and welfare programs of our various governments. As it happens, a good idea that can be realistic and a help in daily living is enacted. Now, in order for the program to work, some kind of committee needs to be instituted. And that fact becomes the downfall of the program, since the individuals being paid by the enactors want to be sure that they will continue their sinecures and not have to seek employment in the real world. And the group then builds layers of "protection" around the original idea and the personnel. The idea is "evoluted", growing constantly and becomes impersonal and mutates into something the originators did not ask for.
So much for not watching all the idiotic forums and boards of America. Keep your eyes on them, fellow citizens.
Posted by Richard, University of Florida on June 8, 2008:
It is no surprise to me that the entire ZT movement (indoctrination) started in the schools. If after years of application and generations of exposure the mini-government of the local school can convince its students that it is ok for the government to eschew due process, habeas corpus, and other such rights and responsibilities of civil life, imagine what ideally docile subjects said school will churn out for the larger state (which, by the way, funds the very schools that are supposed to be training independent and thoughtful adults). To deny a student the right to circumstance, evidence, analysis, and public debate -- how much more dehumanizing, let alone un-American, can a system become?
Thank you Randy, for holding this ground. Your page should be required reading for all educators.
Posted by Michael J, Sydney, Australia on June 20, 2008:
It has always seemed to me that "Zero Common Sense" is the problem, rather than "Zero Tolerance".
I think that a zero tolerance approach to illegal drugs makes perfect sense. However punishing our correspondent Dennis, who clearly didn't use drugs, is simply stupid. The principal should have waited a few seconds to see if he actually bought the drugs before acting.
We hear similar stories of students being punished for vitamins or even candy, because it looks like drugs. Again, the problem isn't lack of tolerance, it is plain stupidity.
Too often, the perpetrators of this foolishness will claim Zero Tolerance as their justification, but it just isn't true. A policy of zero tolerance for weapons means stamping out weapons, not suspending kids for pointing their finger and saying "bang".
Perhaps we need teachers and administrators who can make a simple decision, rather than some of the zombies who currently pervade.