This Is True
Randy Cassingham

Randy Cassingham's Blog

Historical Details and Author's Notes from This is True® - the First For-Profit E-mail Publication (and Still Going Strong).

bullet  Verizon: We Know Better than You

Verizon subscribers have had quite the go of it the past few weeks. Three weeks ago their spam filter tripped on a single word in the issue, so the Premium edition was blocked from everyone at Verizon (and their subsidiaries, like GTE.net) -- even if you had followed my recommendation and put thisistrue.com and lyris.net in your personal "whitelist".

Verizon decided that one word was "bad" and bounced every issue. Since there are quite a few Premium subscribers at Verizon, that meant quite a few bounces. That, in turn, "proved" the issues you paid to get are spam, and thus the next week, they bounced it again. And then the third week, last week, again. So many of you complained to them that they called me that second week, and promised they'd fix it. (You saw how well they did!) Last week, I jumped through their stupid "Please unblock me, I'm not a spammer" hoop, and this week's issue will supposedly get through; they insist they're no longer blocking. We'll see.

(I'm happy to note: it apparently got through fine. The whole time, there was apparently no interruption with the free edition. Go figure.)

Naturally, all of these subscribers have meanwhile gotten plenty of actual spam, proving just how ineffective the filters can be: you get real spam, but don't get mail you not only want, but even paid for. How nice.

If you have such problems with your ISP (Internet Service Provider), I suggest you vote with your feet! Dump ISPs who insist they know better than you do what you want. I recommend Google's gmail: they have the best spam filters in the business (but, if they do make a mistake, you can still find it in the "spam folder" for 30 days). Extra nice: you can use them even if you can't dump your ISP (say, Verizon is the only way you can get broadband where you live), and you don't have to change your e-mail address if you do change your ISP. But don't just quit: tell them why you are dumping them. If they realize they are losing lots of customers because they do a sloppy spam filtering job, they will improve. But it will take a lot of complaints for them to notice it.

Meanwhile, as in any war, there will be casualties among the innocent.

- - -

So after saying that in Monday's issue, Art in Florida wrote to ask what word tripped their filter? "I can't be the first premium reader to be on the edge of my seat waiting for the punchline," he wrote. Surely, he said, it was something about "h u m a n    o r g a n s", right?!

Well, are you ready?

It's one of the most shocking words in the English language.

Something that Verizon clearly thinks no one should have to read, see, or think about.

The kind of perversion that corrupts the morals of our youth.

And leads to permanent, raging insanity.

So are you sure you want to know?

OK, but don't say I didn't warn you.

It was "casino".

My condolences to your survivors.

Most Recent Comments

Poor Darrin, imposed upon by all those Microsoft e-mail clients. I wish to protest my innocence in that regard, though, since I do not and have never used a Microsoft e-mail program. MS Messenger? junk. As Darrin reports, a huge quantity of spam is propagated automatically by these e-mail clients using the address book and auto-forward features.

Darrin, and others, should be grateful to the growing percentage of computer users who employ Macintosh OS and who have systems which cheerfully ignore those worms & viruses which inhabit MS-land.

Naturally, as the market share of the Mac OS grows, so will its appeal to hackers & spammers. But for now, there is a level of comfort and reliability only dreamed of by all those Win-XP users.

So Darrin, you have reason to complain, but leave me and my OS-10 out of it.

Sorry Randy, gotta disagree with your assessment of gmail's spam filters as the best. Just this morning, a number of my newsletters wound up in my spam "folder". On the other hand, I don't remember getting false negatives -- i.e., spam in my inbox. But I do remember one mail I sent out that they blocked supposedly because it was spam. Man, was I furious! I wrote a strong letter to support calling their spam filter stupid. Nothing. My mail? It had to do with Free Software -- as in Richard M. Stallman's Free Software Foundation. Not the free software you get from warez sites or those offering OEM copies.

IMHO, the best spam filters belong to Yahoo!Mail -- hardly any false negatives or false positives.

---

I have a Yahoo mail account. Yahoo is so bad that I abandoned it for anything useful. False positives, false negatives, and incredibly obvious ones at that. Mail that disappears rather than bounce. It goes on and on.

I didn't say gmail is perfect, I said it's the best. As I've said again and again, there's always room for improvement. But it's heads and shoulders above Yahoo, Hotmail, and others. Let's hope it stays that way. -rc

I use a company called DSLExtreme. Their spam filter doesn't catch everything, and I get false positives, but by far they give me EXACTLY what I want: a connection to the internet, an email address, and no pushed content. Unless I've specifically blocked an address, any suspect messages are moved to the spam folder, where it sits for my review.

Post a Comment

Read this before posting a comment! Comments are of course the opinion of the poster. All comments must be approved by the site owner before they appear. Only interesting, pertinent comments that have to do with the entry will be approved, and all comments may be edited for brevity, flow, or grammar. Read the existing comments before posting your own to ensure you're not saying something that's already been covered.

Blog Updates